GSC got back to me and told me they weren't able to get the fix done in time. But, I just checked and saw that Meetinghouse Locator was updated! So, either someone hung around late on a Friday and got it working, or a miracle occurred and the systems finally synced.
Here's something else the GSC said:
"I did also find out that the system should update automatically after you make the changes in LCR, but it can take up to three days. In this case it looks like it didn't update correctly, however in the future it may respond correctly if you need to do this again."
Granted, I'm a technical person and the person who wrote this probably wasn't too careful with words, but this statement doesn't give me much comfort: "in the future it may respond correctly"
lajackson wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2024 11:05 am
And the moral of this story is, never post in one convenient centralized place what you can easily post in many places where you are able to forget to update some of them from time to time.
While it's great to have everything in one centralized place, it's easier said than done. Any large organization is going to have a variety of systems. Some of them will be custom-built software and others will be commercial systems. Just trying to figure out the appropriate place to get certain data can be a challenge when you have a lot of systems. Even though it can be complex, it should be able to work reliably and notify people about problems so they can be resolved. There are even orchestration systems you can buy to help with these integrations. Perhaps improving systems integration is not an important area for the church right now. I'm working on improving a system integration with a third party for my employer right now, and it can be quite painful and time consuming to get it working correctly, as well as identify error situations and how to handle them--especially if you don't have control over some systems (vendor APIs, third-party providers, etc.). But it's taken us a few years to put effort into improving this integration. I can understand the desire to make it work vs. having the budget to fix the problem. But maybe now that the church is aware of the problem, someone will investigate further.
russellhltn wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2024 6:29 pm
I don't envy the developers that effectively have to develop on live systems.
Maybe you're referring to trying to troubleshoot something in production? I don't know what the church IT department does internally, but I do remember 12-15 years ago when they were asking church members to help that we had access to non-production systems on which we could test. But, considering the church has several systems, it may be unlikely that they have a full sandbox running of all the disparate systems talking with each other.