bgtaylor4 wrote:That only helps you see what is scheduled. It does not help you as a building scheduler to help other ward's members who call you asking for help in using the their calendars. In the real world, even if everyone with questions is directed to view the webinar slides, they will still ask the building scheduler questions on how to apply that information to their situation, to be walked through their own calendars/choices as they set things up. And realistically that shouldn't be having to go meet them somewhere or drive to their homes. As Building Scheduler you should be able to view ALL calendars for your building, from/for any ward in the building. IT IS AN ABSOLUTE NECESSITY.
Why does the building scheduler need to help other ward members about their calendars? And why is there no one else in each ward who can do this? Making the assumption that the building scheduler is the only one, and will be the only one, familiar with how the calendar works seems to be overly limiting when not necessary.
The paradigm shift from a single source for scheduling to distributed scheduling means there should be a number of people in each ward familiar enough to be able to teach calendar procedures. Members can also teach themselves by reading the calendar help. Having a ward calendar coordinator as described in
this post meets the need for a ward member responsible as a single point of contact. The entire concept of the new calendar is to move away from a single source for calendar scheduling and resource management. Why defeat the new calendar model by artificially imposing the old methodology?