funaddict wrote:What about a situation where a youth pays for an activity out of pocket, but then is unable to attend. Should he get his money back?
As long as the money is still available, I would certainly say yes to that question. If the youth commits to go and makes a payment, and then the ward makes a non-refundable payment for the activity, then the money can't be refunded. But otherwise, yes.
funaddict wrote:I understand that if you have a fundraiser and raise enough money to pay for all 10 scouts in your ward to attend camp, and then one of them can't attend, by no means should he be allowed to "cash out" his unused portion of the raised funds.
Definitely true.
funaddict wrote:So it seems logical to me that if a youth paid for the activity on his own, and then the ward decides a fundraiser is needed to pay for that activity, and raises the money for all the kids, the original kid should get his original, personal, payment back.
I suppose that makes some sense, but that means the ward is not understanding the Handbook. The very clear order in the handbook is: 1) Budget funds; 2) personal payment by participant; 3) fundraiser. So to say that option 3 is supposed to replace option 2 means that the fundraiser was not done appropriately -- it was not designed to fit the need that remained after personal payments, even though that is very clearly what it is supposed to do.
But if the ward has already gone ahead and done that and now has excess funds, I suppose the best remedy is to refund the personal payment. But in the future, the ward should follow the handbook and avoid the awkward situation.
Questions that can benefit the larger community should be asked in a public forum, not a private message.