Member
Our stake was selected as a trial/beta group for the new donation entry in LCR. I wanted to share a couple of thoughts after 2 weeks trying it. Week 1, no problems at all. Week 2, could not finalize the batch approvals.
1. It is simpler and will be a good thing when it works reliably.
2. It is buggy with how it handles the two approvals. The first person logs in and does the donation entry and when they get to the approval stage, it logs out the first person and the second person (one must be a bishopric member) logs into LCR to perform the second approval on the batch.
3. The system is trying to use local browser cookies to enforce the requirement that both people are in the same place using the same computer. Both approvals must be done in the same browser due to the use of cookies.
4. In our case, the cookies can get messed up and you can get stuck with the second person unable to approve the batch. If this happens support suggests clearing the cookies or switching browsers. However, switching browsers doesn't work if the 1st approver did their step in a different browser. Both approvals must be in the same browser so you have to go back to approval one and start from that point in a different browser (e.g. firefox rather than chrome).
5. In our situation, we got stuck and the 2nd person could not approve the batch. There was no error -- the "Approve" button would switch to "Approving..." and then revert back to "Approve" waiting for the user to click it (again). There is nobody to call on a Sunday for support. We deposited the funds in the bank and left the batch open. Today, support would not close the batch for me and wanted me to get the two original people working on the batch to get together in person on one PC and they would walk them through trying to close the batch. (We have camps this week, so that isn't an option until Sunday.)
6. Note that whichever login the donations are entered under is now tied to the batch -- somebody else can't step in and try to finish it (like a financial clerk versus a ward clerk). Yes, this makes sense but from a trouble shooting step and trying to fix this after the fact it adds a hurdle so I just mention it as an FYI.
7. Even though we're a beta testing ward, support could not escalate the issue to the developers without us first getting the two approvers together and going through support steps to close the batch. Support is simply setup to try to get the batch closed (but would not close it on their end for us). So, it's not really like a beta test where our ward is helping the developers squash specific bugs and because of that lack of a tie to the devs I'm going to revert to using MLS. If I felt we were actually helping squash bugs, I'd be all for helping them out. After talking to support, it seemed pretty clear that we're not furthering the developers efforts -- it's just adding to our own headaches. Back to MLS for now.
Please don't take this post as complaining. This is a beta/trial. I'm providing this mostly as help for others that may get in a jam on a Sunday when support is closed. It will be good when it's reliable.
Update: I got a call back from support stating there have been more calls this morning from other units reporting the same problem. They have escalated the issue.
1. It is simpler and will be a good thing when it works reliably.
2. It is buggy with how it handles the two approvals. The first person logs in and does the donation entry and when they get to the approval stage, it logs out the first person and the second person (one must be a bishopric member) logs into LCR to perform the second approval on the batch.
3. The system is trying to use local browser cookies to enforce the requirement that both people are in the same place using the same computer. Both approvals must be done in the same browser due to the use of cookies.
4. In our case, the cookies can get messed up and you can get stuck with the second person unable to approve the batch. If this happens support suggests clearing the cookies or switching browsers. However, switching browsers doesn't work if the 1st approver did their step in a different browser. Both approvals must be in the same browser so you have to go back to approval one and start from that point in a different browser (e.g. firefox rather than chrome).
5. In our situation, we got stuck and the 2nd person could not approve the batch. There was no error -- the "Approve" button would switch to "Approving..." and then revert back to "Approve" waiting for the user to click it (again). There is nobody to call on a Sunday for support. We deposited the funds in the bank and left the batch open. Today, support would not close the batch for me and wanted me to get the two original people working on the batch to get together in person on one PC and they would walk them through trying to close the batch. (We have camps this week, so that isn't an option until Sunday.)
6. Note that whichever login the donations are entered under is now tied to the batch -- somebody else can't step in and try to finish it (like a financial clerk versus a ward clerk). Yes, this makes sense but from a trouble shooting step and trying to fix this after the fact it adds a hurdle so I just mention it as an FYI.
7. Even though we're a beta testing ward, support could not escalate the issue to the developers without us first getting the two approvers together and going through support steps to close the batch. Support is simply setup to try to get the batch closed (but would not close it on their end for us). So, it's not really like a beta test where our ward is helping the developers squash specific bugs and because of that lack of a tie to the devs I'm going to revert to using MLS. If I felt we were actually helping squash bugs, I'd be all for helping them out. After talking to support, it seemed pretty clear that we're not furthering the developers efforts -- it's just adding to our own headaches. Back to MLS for now.
Please don't take this post as complaining. This is a beta/trial. I'm providing this mostly as help for others that may get in a jam on a Sunday when support is closed. It will be good when it's reliable.
Update: I got a call back from support stating there have been more calls this morning from other units reporting the same problem. They have escalated the issue.