New Member
While performing a first time review of the new electronic Unit Financial Statement (THANK YOU, THANK YOU, I've eagerly anticipated this all year!!), an Action Item in the Fast Offering Analysis tab pointed me to an issue of MRN missing for FO recipient. Looking further I found the ward had reimbursed a member for multiple donations made to the local community food pantry and listed the pantry as the FO recipient.
When getting background info about the transactions, the bishop responded that a ward member volunteering there had brought to his attention the dire need the pantry was in. The bishop directed the member to monitor the needs weekly and make donations to help fill the needs. He then directed 3 ward members with "immediate needs" to use the local pantry instead of waiting for the bishop storehouse (BSH) delivery truck which comes about every other week (BSH is about 1.5 hour drive away). The bishop also said the ward made donations from their annual BSH allotment as well.
As a finance clerk there are a number of things that seem irregular with these transactions, primarily the loss of accountability as to who was assisted and how the funds were used. In a sense it kept assistance received "off the books" for the member(s) receiving assistance. Its always been my understanding that FO funds are used to benefit a specific individual not a charitable organization. Also, I'll concede BSH allotments amounts are not on my finance clerk radar, at least not at the stake level though I am able to see unit orders completed and their cost. (I was not aware there were allotments for the BSH or how those funds could be diverted elsewhere.)
Am I missing some guidance somewhere allowing FO funds to be used to finance community welfare organizations? Usually when there is an "immediate need" that can't wait for a BSH order to be filled a ward leader would grocery shop with/for the member to fill the immediate need and then the leader would be reimbursed with the member listed as the FO recipient. Is there a process allowing funds that would normally go to the BSH to be diverted to a local pantry instead when a member is directed to use the pantry instead?
When getting background info about the transactions, the bishop responded that a ward member volunteering there had brought to his attention the dire need the pantry was in. The bishop directed the member to monitor the needs weekly and make donations to help fill the needs. He then directed 3 ward members with "immediate needs" to use the local pantry instead of waiting for the bishop storehouse (BSH) delivery truck which comes about every other week (BSH is about 1.5 hour drive away). The bishop also said the ward made donations from their annual BSH allotment as well.
As a finance clerk there are a number of things that seem irregular with these transactions, primarily the loss of accountability as to who was assisted and how the funds were used. In a sense it kept assistance received "off the books" for the member(s) receiving assistance. Its always been my understanding that FO funds are used to benefit a specific individual not a charitable organization. Also, I'll concede BSH allotments amounts are not on my finance clerk radar, at least not at the stake level though I am able to see unit orders completed and their cost. (I was not aware there were allotments for the BSH or how those funds could be diverted elsewhere.)
Am I missing some guidance somewhere allowing FO funds to be used to finance community welfare organizations? Usually when there is an "immediate need" that can't wait for a BSH order to be filled a ward leader would grocery shop with/for the member to fill the immediate need and then the leader would be reimbursed with the member listed as the FO recipient. Is there a process allowing funds that would normally go to the BSH to be diverted to a local pantry instead when a member is directed to use the pantry instead?