New Member
I have been trying to find the correct address but have found several and do not know which is right. Does anyone know what address to mail a letter to if you want it to reach the first presidency?
That thought has crossed my mind as well. But I have decided that the handbook is unambiguous, whereas any conclusions I would draw based on general conference references to letters would be wildly speculative. We often don't know when the letters were sent, or if they were sent with special permission, or if the sender has a personal relationship with the general authority, or if they were asked by someone in authority to send the letter. Such speculation is pointless; "as for me and my house, we will..." follow the handbook.wiscombe.peter wrote:Although the handbook does state that we are not to send letters, they are a widely used source of general conference talk material.
While not always the case, often the letters that are referenced in conference are from friends or acquaintances.johnshaw wrote:I'm very conflicted on this one, aebrown's message asside, the General Authorities send a message of encouragement when they include the so very often in their Conference Talks.
Personally, I'd say your stake president/bishop are the most capable people to deal with your problem. And I'd be surprised if they don't care tremendously. Been there and done that. They care and are capable.bkhamlin wrote:From experience. Any letter sent will be sent down to the are authority and or the stake president. Probably the least capable people to help with the problem. Don't be surprised if no one cares. Been there and done that.
The military chain of command takes you next to the Area Seventy who chairs the coordinating council in which your stake president participates.Lillypotter0912 wrote:What if you've already talked to the bishop and stake president? My husband is ex-military, so I get chain of command. Where do you go from the stake president?
There really just isn't anything here that's going to satisfy you frankly, if there is an issue AND the Bishop/Stake President just ins't responding, you'll need to gather people around you - multiple people, families, men and women - and have everyone backing your 'story'.Lillypotter0912 wrote:What if you've already talked to the bishop and stake president? My husband is ex-military, so I get chain of command. Where do you go from the stake president?
"In most cases, correspondence from members to General Authorities will be referred back to their local leaders. Stake presidents who need clarification about doctrinal or other Church matters may write in behalf of their members to the First Presidency."Haileejaneevans wrote:How can I get counsel from a general authority?
Click on the link in the post right after yours by russellhltn. (Handbook 2 is available to anyone, member or not.) Read all of the short section, but especially the second paragraph. Then use that for your guide as you visit with your home or visiting teachers, your bishop, and others as needed.Haileejaneevans wrote:How can I get counsel from a general authority?
If you don't feel like you have any ward or stake leaders to talk to, I would start with prayer. The Lord will help you to know what you can do. I have never been in a ward or stake where I felt like all of my leaders were unapproachable, though. If you can't talk to your elders quorum president, Relief Society president, bishop, or stake president, talk to one of their counselors. Ask your home or visiting teachers for help finding someone to talk to if needed. Our Savior has set up a lot of lines for help in His Church, and if you pray, He will open up the line you need.Tink152 wrote:What if the problem is with the local leaders. How do we address that issue?
As you point out, that's a "law of the land" situation. That's pretty much outside of the church's control. Even in the US with the more lax privacy laws, there's no listing for anyone above the stake presidency that's accessible to the general membership.leevb wrote:Due to the laws in the European Union we cannot make church leaders be visible.