nfarley88 wrote:I've recently become Stake Clerk, and I found that one of the wards (with 12 missionaries!) in the stake lumps all missionary fast offerings into a fake missionary donor (one with a name like 'Missionary').
If the batch was to be looked at closely in a audit this would revel an audit exception as the name on the donor slip did not match the name on the batch report.
nfarley88 wrote: How should a ward clerk record fast offerings from full-time missionaries?
Under the name or the member making the donation.
mrrad wrote:The best way to keep records is to make sure that what's written on the white, donation form is accurately represented in MLS too.
This is not only the best way it is the only way it should be done.
nfarley88 wrote:It's a shame there is no way to simply link the donation to thier membership record.
If you look at MLS and listen to some of the talk on the forms it looks as if they are heading in that direction.
nfarley88 wrote:I think the reason they have assigned it to 'Missionary' in the past is to avoid pressure on an already busy schedule, but this is no reason to keep inaccurate records in my opinion!
I can't agree more.
nfarley88 wrote: I'll consult with local leaders to see what has been said before, but without an official word it seems best to record names with donations rather than simply donations under a dummy donor.
Maybe a good time to have a mandatory review of the online financial training. Not only for clerks but for Bishopric members as well.