Gary_Miller wrote:If nether one of these are available then the bishop can just attach a note stating why there was no bill.
This is covered under question 17 of the financial audit checklist and in the training found on the
Finance section of
RKATS. Question 17 states:
If the original receipt or invoice is lost, the substitute documentation should include a written explanation with the payment purpose, a description of what was bought or paid for, the date the payment was made, the name of the person assisted (for payments from fast offerings), and proper approval. Such documentation should be a rare exception. If several transactions are documented this way, mark this checklist item No.
Fast offering assistance documentation should be provided by the fast offering assistance beneficiary if possible. This would include the suitable substitute needed for the situation described by the OP. As noted in question 17, such documentation should be a rare exception. In other words, if the fast offering assistance beneficiary is going to receive assistance for more than one payment then he/she should obtain some documentation from the landlord. This may be a problem when there is a verbal arrangement and there is no written lease agreement. For such situations I have had bishops ask the fast offering assistance recipient to write out the receipt and have the landlord sign it.