Member
A member of our ward was called as a branch president for a Spanish branch in our Stake. His record, and his family's records, are still in our ward. (His family still attends our ward.) His calling was recorded (happened back in September) I presume in the stake MLS. If I look at the online directory and cdol, he shows up as the branch president. That's good.
If I look at his record in our ward MLS, the calling is not listed, so he shows up on the 'Members without Callings' list.
If I look at Leader Resources > Organizations > Members without Callings, he does *not* show up.
In a way, at least that's consistent. No calling in MLS so he's on M w/o C. Calling in CDOL so he's not on M w/o C.
But it'd be nice to have it correct in both places. If I look at our stake patriarch (a member of our ward) or the seminary teachers from our ward, they all have their stake callings noted on their MLS record (text color is black, unlike regular ward callings which are blue [and clickable]).
Shouldn't the branch president calling show up as a stake calling?
If I look at his record in our ward MLS, the calling is not listed, so he shows up on the 'Members without Callings' list.
If I look at Leader Resources > Organizations > Members without Callings, he does *not* show up.
In a way, at least that's consistent. No calling in MLS so he's on M w/o C. Calling in CDOL so he's not on M w/o C.
But it'd be nice to have it correct in both places. If I look at our stake patriarch (a member of our ward) or the seminary teachers from our ward, they all have their stake callings noted on their MLS record (text color is black, unlike regular ward callings which are blue [and clickable]).
Shouldn't the branch president calling show up as a stake calling?